PUBLIC NOTES TO ACTIONS: COMPLETE RECORDED TASK
Nolan Kido | https://nolankido.com/technology/organize-public-notes/

The input and instruction below are copied unchanged from the retained task
record. The assistant output that follows is reproduced verbatim, including
its Markdown tables. These were public website-preparation notes.

===== COMPLETE INPUT AND INSTRUCTION RECORD =====

RECORDED NOTES-ORGANIZATION TASK
Prepared October 27, 2026, Honolulu date.

These were actual working notes for preparing public website articles.
They contain public project context and explicit gaps, not private correspondence.

INPUT

N1: The personal website needs permanent pages for Review Reply Writer, Preflight/canonKeeper, and Dinner on Time.
N2: Review Reply Writer has a public repository and a historical Gemma demo; the public article says its old model runs do not validate current-source quality.
N3: Preflight's public README records a Sherlock Holmes audit with correct findings, incorrect findings, and unresolved cases; the new website page must show those distinctions.
N4: Dinner on Time has a public Vimeo demonstration of a deterministic Alexa+ experience simulation made with AI assistance; it is not a live Alexa service and has no runtime AI.
N5: GitHub and DEV are verified public-work profiles for Nolan; the website's main subject order stays Technology, Living Well, Poker, Creative Work.
N6: We do not have a publishable record of a personal tournament story, completed Living Well trial, local-laptop comparison, or travel plan.
N7: No deadline, customer adoption, business revenue, human-review result, or time saving has been supplied.
N8: Case pages need a clear task, actual artifact, source/version, material limits, author link, and links from the relevant existing hubs.

INSTRUCTION GIVEN TO THE ASSISTANT

Organize these notes into a compact actionable publication checklist with columns task, evidence/input, next action, and status (ready to prepare / requires source material / editorial requirement). Preserve unknowns and source note IDs. Prioritize supported publication work, then list blocked personal reports. Do not invent dates, assign responsibility to another person, assert a deployment happened, or invent any result.

RECORD SCOPE

The output saved alongside this file is the actual assistant response produced
from this task during the website work. It is not a reconstructed response from
a separate model service. The factual inputs came from the public project
records linked by the case studies; this task organized the supplied notes and
did not independently verify those projects. No timing or human quality rating
was collected for this notes-organization step.

===== VERBATIM ASSISTANT OUTPUT =====

# Publication checklist from supplied notes

## Supported publication work

| Task | Evidence/input | Next action | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prepare a permanent Review Reply Writer page | N1, N2: A public repository and historical Gemma demonstration exist. The public article says the old model runs do not validate current-source quality. | Draft the case around the available artifacts. Label the demonstration as historical and preserve the limit on current-source quality. | ready to prepare |
| Prepare a permanent Preflight / canonKeeper page | N1, N3: The public README records a Sherlock Holmes audit with correct findings, incorrect findings, and unresolved cases. | Draft the case with those three outcome categories kept distinct. Identify the source/version and avoid turning the mixed findings into a general success claim. | ready to prepare |
| Prepare a permanent Dinner on Time page | N1, N4: A public Vimeo demonstration shows a deterministic Alexa+ experience simulation made with AI assistance. It is not a live Alexa service and has no runtime AI. | Draft the case around the demonstrated simulation. Explain the role of AI in making it and preserve both runtime limits. | ready to prepare |
| Connect verified public-work profiles | N5: GitHub and DEV are verified public-work profiles for Nolan. | Use the verified profile links in the site's public-work references. | ready to prepare |
| Complete the required fields and connections for each case | N8: Each case needs a clear task, actual artifact, source/version, material limits, author link, and links from relevant existing hubs. | Check each draft against all six requirements. Keep any missing source or version detail unresolved until supplied. | editorial requirement |
| Preserve the main subject order | N5: The order remains Technology, Living Well, Poker, Creative Work. | Place the new cases and hub links within that order. | editorial requirement |
| Keep unsupported outcomes and commitments out of the copy | N7: No deadline, customer adoption, business revenue, human-review result, or time saving has been supplied. | Leave those matters unknown. Do not add a deadline, outcome claim, or implication that publication has occurred. | editorial requirement |

## Personal reports requiring source material

| Task | Evidence/input | Next action | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Personal tournament story | N6: No publishable record has been supplied. | Obtain a publishable firsthand record before preparing the story. | requires source material |
| Completed Living Well trial report | N6: No publishable record of a completed trial has been supplied. | Obtain the actual trial record and observed results before presenting a completed report. | requires source material |
| Local-laptop comparison | N6: No publishable comparison record has been supplied. | Obtain the comparison inputs, method, and actual observations before drafting conclusions. | requires source material |
| Personal travel plan | N6: No publishable travel plan has been supplied. | Obtain the intended plan and supporting inputs before preparing a personal account. | requires source material |

“Ready to prepare” means the supplied notes identify public artifacts to work from. It does not establish that a draft is complete, reviewed, or published. No deployment or new result is recorded here.